Showing posts with label church growth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label church growth. Show all posts

Monday, March 7, 2016

Feelings, Nothing More Than Feelings

There are so many people who are governed entirely by their feelings and they do not want to use their minds and their brains.  Even in a religious service they just want happiness and enjoyment.  They want to have a good time, as they call it, to get excited, to work themselves up by singing hymns and songs and choruses, and to keep on repeating and repeating until they are in a state of mental intoxication.  They do not want to be made to think.  Life is hard enough as it is, they say, without having to struggle with this thought and that, so let us have more singing and less preaching and so on.  Feelings!  Just a riot of enjoyment—that is a foolish person.  Do you see the relevance of all this to the state of the church today?  It does not matter how crowded your churches are in whatever country you belong to.  What I want to know is, what happens when the crowd gets there? How is the time spent?  And, alas, one sees and hears more and more music and entertainment and less and less of teaching and doctrine and true understanding.  That is one of the characteristics of folly.

D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones
“Darkness and Light: An Exposition of Ephesians 4:17-5:17,” pg. 145

HT: Glenn Chatfield

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

The Secret to Sustained Church Growth

And they devoted themselves to the apostles' teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers.… And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved.  (Acts 2:42, 47)


From the start of the New Testament church there is worship.  God is speaking (through the Apostles’ teaching) and believers are listening.  God is giving his gifts (through the breaking of the bread) and believers are receiving gifts.… They have gathered around “the apostle’s teaching,” and “the breaking of bread” (as well as baptism, see Acts 2:38-41), corporate “fellowship,” and “the prayers.”  God comes to them and they respond with faith and devotion, not to mention a little bit of “awe” and service to those in “need.”  From the start we see there was worship, witness, and service to neighbors.

But there’s something else very intriguing about this worship.  It appears that it facilitated the incorporation of new believers into the community of saints.  And even more, implicit in this worship was the presence of the outreach going on among the “fellowship” of believers.  When “the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved,” it implies that those who were “added to their number” were added through nothing other than the means which the believers had devoted themselves to—“the apostles’ teaching … the fellowship … the breaking of bread and … the prayers.”

Lucas Woodford, Great Commission, Great Confusion, or Great Confession?, 183-4

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Proclaimers of Truth or Modifiers of Behavior?

On any given Sunday morning, a man stands before a group of people in order to share what he has studied recently.  Hours of preparation are now culminating in a delivery to attentive ears—hearts desiring the pure milk of the word, hopeful of what God will be saying through his servant.  For 30-45 minutes, the message continues in a crafted rhetoric with interspersed humor, anecdotes, and word pictures toward an over-arching point summarized in the conclusion.  At the end one may feel invigorated by being taken the the heights of glory or joys of victory.  Perhaps there is peace, knowing the comfort of certain promises.  Maybe there was condemnation for not doing enough with the resulting sense of challenge and determination for more and better.

And maybe, just maybe, you heard of Christ and him crucified.

This is not to depreciate what was undoubtedly great effort to create and deliver, nor can it be said that I have no appreciation for responsibilities within and without the local church and his family in particular that must be juggled in order to bring the message.  My concern is this: are you and I hearing the word of God being rightly expounded, or are we being manipulated in order to fulfill a need or adhere to the vision of the pastor or overseers.  In other words, did the man make Christ known, or did he try to manipulate his listeners with a view to a particular outcome?

Why raise the issue?
Many have taken mega-churches to task for their lack of biblical teaching during their main meetings.  Names like Elevation, Hillsong, Saddleback, Lakewood, and Willow Creek are regular fodder as messages from their pulpits are weighed and found wanting, they soften or eliminate what scripture specifically says concerning any number of topics.  Yet these high profile groups are but the tip of the iceberg.  Smaller assemblies regularly engage in similar tactics hoping to gain the same levels of success.  Instead of preaching the whole counsel of God, they work on key topical areas to move the flock in a particular direction.

Topical studies are useful and should be used to draw together scripture as a cohesive unit.  The messages with which I contend are those that apply psychological pressure, rather than sound exegesis, in order to manipulate the intended audience.  The pulpit turns from being a place from which flowed the promises of God to a platform for casting the leaders' joint vision for the future.  A series (or more) of meetings is used to adjust group thinking until all are on the same program.  You will be assimilated into the collective: resistance is futile.  Or those that resist are invited to leave.

Why would assembly leaders do this?
Multiple forces exert pressure on local gatherings.  Externally, there are laws of the land and shifting cultural norms that attempt to tear down the fabric of the gospel.  Internally, congregants see success of other groups or read of innovative ideas that might be implemented.  This is not to say only those enduring difficulties fall into the mentality of manipulation.  Assemblies that have remained faithful and grown through sound instruction and care may find themselves at a place where they feel a need to shift from "small thinking" to "large thinking"—church for 50 being different than church for 500 or 5,000.

What does scripture say?
Scripture does not have alternate organizational goals and models based on size.  Instead, there is a unity of purpose and duties regardless of attendance, location, or other factors.
  • •  The duty of the elder/overseer in the local assembly is to "shepherd the flock of God that is among you" (1 Pet 5:2) and manifests itself in varying ways: instructing (Tit 1:9), rebuking (Tit 1:9, 13), overseeing (1 Tim 5:17), etc.  
  • •  Faithful men are trained to carry on God's word (2 Tim 2:2).
  • •  Spiritual gifts are employed for mutual encouragement and edification (Rom 12:6-8; 1 Cor 12:4-11, 28-30).
  • •  The goal of the church is always to make disciples (Matt 28:19-20).
When the assembly finds the size, location, etc. cumbersome, the answer is not to motivate people for a new program or project, but remain faithful to sound teaching and do what is required to maintain it.

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

T'ain't Necessarily So

Brian Orme, a Southern Baptist expert in church trends, has written an article challenging assumptions of church growth and labeling them as "Ten Old Wives Tales about Church Growth."  Here are his main points:
  1. If You’re Not Growing, Something’s Wrong
  2. The More You Grow, the Healthier You Are
  3. Contemporary Music Will Save Your Church
  4. Church Growth Can Be Manufactured
  5. If Your Church Grows, Your Leader Is “Anointed”
  6. If Your Church Doesn’t Grow, It’s a Problem with the Leader
  7. Good Preaching Is the Answer to Growing Your Church
  8. You Will Retain a Large Percentage of Your Visitors on Special Days
  9. The More Programs You Offer, the More Your Church Will Grow
  10. If You Build It, They Will Come
I agree that each of these needs to be exposed for what they are.  My only reservation is that he sometimes does not go far enough to butcher the sacred cow.  Somebody should get that guy a meat grinder.

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Give Them Christ, Not Relevance

Time and again, those churches who cling to their God and Bibles are encouraged to "get with the program" and be relevant to the culture in order to reach the unchurched.  While this sounds good, there are data that just the opposite is true.  Larry Peters has written a post comparing the culture mantra promoted by Barna with Mormon practice, and (lo and behold) the Mormons are growing at a faster rate than Christianity by breaking all the culture rules.

Why is this happening?  The answer should surprise no one.  People know that the world system is a wasteland, but yet they look to that very system or themselves for meaning in it.  What they find is more waste and corruption.  There is a desire to latch hold of what is real and solid, even if that reality is contrived.  Herein Mormon doctrine fills the longing.  From all appearances, this group solidly believes and teaches what is observable as natural law: community, protection, family, morals, and singleness of purpose.  This is what people desire but seek it in the wrong place.

If the church takes up the world, we simply offer one more fleeting experience that will fade away.  We should offer Christ and him crucified.  This is what will satisfy the longing heart.

Friday, June 22, 2012

Measure of a Ministry

Chris Rosebrough of Fighting for the Faith, Letter of Marque, and Pirate Christian Radio posted this status on Facebook this morning:
I'm beginning to believe that the only number that truly counts in ministry is NOT how many people show up on any given Sunday but how many saints you've buried who have died confessing the one true faith.
I do believe he's got it.

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

What Is Your Local Church Proclaiming?

Larry Peters had a post on his blog that was rather good, but today it is gone.  Thankfully, I saved a copy.  Here is what I consider the meaty part.
For too many years we have been told to share our faith.  Our faith is not what our Lord calls us to share.  Our faith cannot be replicated either by action, reason, or argument.  We are not here to convince people by our faith to believe as we believe.  What we are called to share is the Word of God.  We are here to scatter the seed of the Word—in words and in actions.  It seems to me the problems in our church body stem less from people not getting out there than from a severe lack of confidence in the Word of God to do what God promises it will do.

We share about everything but the Word.  We host all sorts of self-interest groups.  We cater to a variety of tastes in music and worship.  We have Bible studies for those who want to listen and those who want to talk, for those who seek THE truth and those who are looking for MY truth.  We organize groups for people by age, interest, marital status, hobby, and need.  We have parking and handicap accessibility.  We have buildings that look like the mall and come complete with all the amenities.  What we lack is the courage and conviction to speak clearly and with confidence the Word of the Lord.  Jesus promises that where that Word is scattered, the Lord will bring forth the plant, the fruit, and gather the harvest (at the proper time).  But we have turned the scattering into a business proposition in which we market what we were called to preach and we preach everything people want to hear but that which the Lord has given us to say.

It would seem to me that the biggest problem we have in growing the Church is that we are too focused on the things we do and not focused enough on what God does.  We say over and over again the Word will not return to Him empty but will accomplish His purpose.  Then we adapt worship to fit personal taste and make our preaching and teaching fit the prevailing norms of communication technology.  We cast visions like seasoned fly fishermen and have professional missionals minding the business goals and keeping up the current stats.  But I am not so sure we actually speak clearly and faithfully the Word of the Lord—or if we do, whether that is central to what we do and who we are.

If there is a common malady affecting congregations, it is not getting out into the community but getting the Word out into the community.  All in all it does no matter how well known we are if we have nothing to say to those folks who know us.  It is not our caring that will save them or our winsome welcome but the Word spoken with courage, confidence, and conviction.  We do not need to see the results to know that God is at work when the words and deeds of His people proceed from and return to the message of Jesus Christ and Him crucified.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

The Four Stages of Church Growth Disease

Bryan Wolfmueller posted on Facebook:
The Four Stages of Church Growth Disease
Stage 1:    I’m uncomfortable with all the changes happening around my church, but I guess it’s okay,
after all, it’s for the ‘lost’ and the ‘youth’ and the ‘mission.’
Stage 2:  I’m disappointed that I’m not being fed at my church, but I also feel guilty for this, after all,
you go to church to serve, not to be served, right?
Stage 3:  I’m looking for a more authentic community of Jesus-followers.
Stage 4:  I’m an atheist.
This is a bit contrived but reflects more of the truth than we care to admit.

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

The New 95 Theses

Chris Rosebrough at Extreme Theology had posted in October, 2008, a modern rendition of Luther's 95 Theses in an effort to debate unbiblical trends rampant in the evangelical church.  Whether one agrees or not with the Lutheran theological perspective behind this list, evangelicals should debate these things to see if their churches are in good order.

[==================================================]

Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses to the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg, the public bulletin board of his day.  In like manner, we, Athanasius and Chrysostom, post these 95 theses on the door of the internet.  Like the original theses, these are debatable, for we believe that it is through vigorous debate that the spirits are tested and truth is revealed.

In publishing these theses, we do not intend to foment division, but to expose those who are creating division within the body of Christ.  We are not addressing any particular church body or person, but invite all who love the Gospel of Jesus Christ to engage in this debate.  We do so in the spirit of the great Reformer, Martin Luther, as we implore the mercies of God upon His Church, for the sake of Jesus Christ, the Lord of the Church and Bishop of our souls.

1.  When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ said “Repent,” He willed that the whole life of believers should be one of repentance.

2.  To “repent” means to be contrite for one’s sins and to trust Jesus Christ and solely in His completed work for one’s forgiveness, life, and salvation.

3.  Those who describe the Christian life as purpose-driven deny true repentance, confuse the Law and the Gospel, and obscure the merits of Christ.

4.  Impious and wicked are the methods of those who substitute self-help and pop-psychology for the Gospel in the name of relevance.

5.  This impious disregard for the Gospel wickedly transforms sacred Scripture into a guidebook for living, a pharisaic sourcebook of principles, and sows tares among the wheat.

6.  Relevance, self-help and pop-psychology have no power to work true contrition over sins and faith in Jesus Christ.

7.  Like clouds without rain, purpose-driven preachers withhold the proclamation of the forgiveness of sins won by Christ on the cross and enslave men’s consciences to the law which they cleverly disguise as so-called 'Biblical Principles'.

8.  By teaching tips for attaining perfect health, debt-free wealth, and better sex in marriage, the purveyors of relevance undermine true fear, love and trust in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

9.  They are enemies of Christ, who distort the Word of God by tearing verses from their original context in order to use them as proof texts for their self-help, pop-psychology agendas.

10.  Injury is done the Word of God when it is used as a source book for practical, relevant “life applications.”

11.  In the name of relevance, our Lord Jesus Christ is reduced to a life-coach whose “gospel” assists and motivates people to achieve the objectives of their self-centered delusions of grandeur.

12.  Apart from the Holy Spirit, the seeker cannot understand the things of God for these are “spiritually discerned” (1 Cor 2:14).

13.  The natural man does not naturally seek the Gospel. “I was found by those who did not seek me; I revealed myself to those who did not ask for me” (Is. 65:1).

14.  The true Seeker of men’s souls is our Lord Jesus Christ who came to seek and to save the lost by His death on the cross (Luke 19:10).

15.  The truly “seeker-sensitive” church proclaims God’s wrath against our sin and His mercy for Jesus’ sake.

16.  The preaching of Christ crucified is a stumbling block to purpose-driven pragmatists and foolishness to church growth consultants.

17.  The true gold of the Church is the Most Holy Gospel of the glory and the grace of God.

18.  But this treasure is a stench in the nostrils of fallen and sinful men because it exposes man’s complete lack of ability to save himself by his own religious efforts.

19.  On the other hand, the fool’s gold of self-help is preferred by sinful men, for it creates the illusion of moral progress and a life that is pleasing to God apart from repentance.

20.  The gold of the Gospel is the net by which Christ would make us fishers of men.

21.  The fool’s gold of self-help is a snare by which purpose-driven purveyors of relevance attempt to capture the riches and approval of men.

22.  The church is holy sheep who hear the voice of their Shepherd.

23.  How can sheep hear the voice of their Shepherd when false shepherds preach self-help and pop-psychology?

24.  Purveyors of purpose-driven relevance are not shepherds of men’s souls but wolves in sheep’s clothing.

25.  Purveyors of relevance claim that self-help, life-applications and biblical principles are the means to reach the unchurched because they meet people’s felt needs.

26.  Yet a person’s greatest need is one he does not by nature feel, namely the need for the righteousness that comes from God through faith in Jesus Christ.

27.  The true means by which fallen sinners are reached is the preaching of Christ and His sacraments. (Romans 10:17)

28.  The true need that mankind is seeking but does not know is justification by grace through faith for Christ’s sake.

29.  Since justification is through faith and not through works, natural man neither seeks it nor desires it.

30.  Therefore, the teaching of justification by grace through faith is neither seeker-sensitive nor relevant to a world that naturally seeks self-justification.

31.  To be in the church is to be union with Christ through faith.

32.  Regardless of the number of people in attendance, the church does not grow unless men are granted repentance and faith by God through the action of His Word.

33.  Scripture clearly teaches that the means by which God grants faith are the the hearing of the Word of Christ (the Gospel) and the water of Holy Baptism.

34.  Therefore, even if a congregation, through their own marketing methods and business prowess were able to draw 100,000 people every Sunday, if the Gospel is not heard and the sacraments are not administered according to the Gospel there is no church and the true Church of Jesus Christ has not grown by a single soul.

35.  If numerical growth is a measure of God’s approval, then we must conclude that God approves of Islam and the Mormons.

36.  If financial success is a measure of God’s approval, then we must conclude that God approves of pornography and gambling.

37.  Cancer and crabgrass both grow rapidly, as does the church that obscures the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

38.  The purveying of purpose-driven relevance is the theology of glory; the preaching of Christ crucified for sinners is the theology of the cross.

39.  The theologian of glory says that the kingdom of God is visible now in buildings, people, and dollars; the theologian of the cross says that the kingdom of God is an article of faith.

40.  The theologian of glory asks “How much?” and “How many?”; the theologian of the cross preaches Christ regardless of how much or how many.

41.  The theologian of glory prepares people to receive health, wealth, and happiness; the theologian of the cross prepares people to suffer and die in faith.

42.  The theologian of glory preaches that God wants to grant you favors; the theologian of the cross preaches the favor of God for the sake of Christ crucified.

43.  The theologian of glory proclaims 40 days of purpose; the theologian of the cross preaches daily dying and rising in Jesus.

44.  God established the Church to be a “mouth house” of forgiveness not a madhouse of activity.

45.  Christ wills that His voice be heard in His Church and not the voice of man when He says, “He who hears you, hears me.” (Luke 10:16)

46.  Purveyors of purpose-driven relevance obscure the voice of Christ and so draw the sheep away from the Good Shepherd.

47.  Christ saves from sin and death not through the motivation of the sinner to do good, but through baptismal death and resurrection.

48.  The mission of the church is not to transform the world but to disciple the nations by baptizing and teaching (Matt 28:19-20).

49.  Anyone who preaches a vision and demands allegiance to it sets up a new papacy among the churches.

50.  A synod or church body is a human institution that exists by the will and consent of its member congregations and pastors.

51.  A synod or church body is not merely an affiliation of churches that agree on a common purpose.

52.  A synod or church body is not the Church, properly speaking, but a fellowship of churches sharing a common confession of faith and practice.

53.  Synods are not of the church’s essence (esse) but for her well being (bene esse).

54.  Synodical leaders are not lords over the churches, but servants of the churches and stewards of their common possessions.

55.  Synodical leaders are not called to promulgate visions but to execute the collective will of the synod’s churches.

56.  The old papacy arrogated the Church’s treasury of merits; the new papacy arrogates the Church’s treasury.

57.  The old papacy said, “As the coin in the coffer clings, so the soul from purgatory springs.”

58.  The new papacy says, “As the coin in the church coffer clings, so another program out of debt springs.”

59.  The old papacy counted plenary indulgences; the new papacy counts money and people.

60.  The old papacy suppressed the Gospel through canon law; the new papacy suppresses the Gospel through constitutions and by-laws.

61.  The old papacy was a friend of Caesar; the new papacy is a friend of Mammon.

62.  The old papacy bound a man’s conscience for the sake his wallet; the new papacy binds a man’s wallet for the sake of his conscience.

63.  The old papacy promulgated infallible dogma; the new papacy promulgates undebatable visions.

64.  The old papacy claims to sit on the seat of Peter; the new papacy claims to sit on the mandate of the majority.

65.  The old papacy reserved the right to judge doctrine and practice; the new papacy judges doctrine and practice by commissions and committees.

66.  The old papacy issued “bulls;” the new papacy issues task force reports.

67.  The old papacy had a college of cardinals; the new papacy has high-priced consultants.

68.  Just as popes and councils have erred in the past, so synodical leaders and synodical conventions err in the present.

69.  A synod that is concerned for the true unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace does not excuse unionism and syncretism.

70.  Unity in doctrine and practice means discernible interchangeability in teaching, preaching, and practice.

71.  Unity in doctrine and practice does not consist in signing confessional statements, but in word and deed.

72.  Worship is doctrine put into practice.

73.  As one worships, so one believes.

74.  As one believes, so one worships.

75.  Christian worship consists in God’s service to us through His giving and our receiving in faith the gifts of Christ’s Word, Body, and Blood, and our service to God by our prayer, praise, and thanksgiving.

76.  Worship that is focused principles for Christian living obscures the Gospel of Jesus Christ and His gifts and is detrimental to faith and salvation.

77.  While Christian liberty allows that worship forms need not be altogether the same in every time and place, unity in faith and practice requires that worship forms must not be altogether different in every time and place.

78.  Worship forms serve as identifying banners in the confessional field of battle.

79.  Peculiar and novel worship forms obscure the unity of the churches and extol the creativity of the worship leaders.

80.  In matters neither commanded nor forbidden in the Word of God (adiaphora), the churches of God are free to change ceremonies according to circumstances, as may be most beneficial and edifying to the churches of God. (Epitome, Art X.4)

81.  Such changes must avoid all frivolity and offenses, particularly with regard to those who are weak in faith (Epitome, Art X.5).

82.  Where the Gospel is at stake, concessions in ceremony must not be made so as to suggest unity with those who deny the Gospel (Epitome, Art X.6)

83.  Therefore, it is contrary to the doctrine of adiaphora to hide the substance of Lutheran doctrine behind a non-Lutheran style of worship.

84.  To create and sustain saving faith, God established the office of the holy ministry in the church to preach the Gospel and administer the sacraments according to our Lord’s institution.

85.  No one may publicly preach, teach, or administer the sacraments in the churches without his being called and ordained.

86.  Those who introduce novelties into the church are the true agents of division.

87.  The ordination of women is a novelty that has caused great division in the church.

88.  The introduction of worship forms not held in common by the churches is a cause of division and a stumbling block.

89.  The church belongs to no man but to Jesus Christ, the incarnate Son of God, and Lord of the church.

90.  Woe to the false prophets who cry, “Unity, unity” when there is no unity.

91.  Again, woe to those who say, “Peace, peace,” when there is no peace.

92.  Again, woe to those who say, “Gospel, gospel,” when there is no Gospel.

93.  Blessed are those who say, “Cross, cross,” when there is no cross.

94.  Christians are to be exhorted that they be diligent in following Christ, their Head, through all suffering, death, and hell;

95.  And thus be confident of entering into heaven through many trials and tribulations, rather than through the assurance of outward peace, unity, and happiness.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

You Know It's True


Thabiti Anyabwile has a good post at The Gospel Coalition entitled Multi-Site Churches Are from the Devil that is worth your time.  I am sorely tempted to say the same about the multi-service church.

"But Steve, doesn't your own church have multiple services?"

Exactly.

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Interstate Churches

And no, I do not mean churches situated along the interstate.

Christianity Today is reporting on plans for Mars Hill church in Seattle to open a satellite group in Portland to get real-time feeds of the home church meetings with Mark Driscoll's preaching.  'Scuse me?  Are they serious?  I am having difficulty fathoming how many ways this is just plain wrong.  And this is not the first group to have done it.

I enjoyed the curt response from Chaplain Mike at Internet Monk.  These megachurches are completely missing the concept of the local church, the body of Christ, and the nature of community.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Contemporvant Growtivation

I got an e-mail from a fellow blogger today making me aware of this video.  Both humorous and painfully honest, this cuts right to the heart of the cheesiness and emptiness of what many churches pass off as "worship."


"Sunday's Coming" Movie Trailer from North Point Media on Vimeo.

Friday, March 19, 2010

Personal Experience as a Mark of Grace

The following is part of an article written by Klemet Preus in LOGIA (Vol. XVIII, No. 2, 15-16) on the subject of Lutherans resisting evangelicalism.  It is a solid warning for any church.

By the time of the Great Awakening in the 1730s, one hundred years after the arrival of the first Puritans, this morphology was completely entrenched in the ecclesiastical and social fiber of New England. The practice of Evangelicalism has always been to cultivate a religious experience as the ground of faith.

In the early 1800s, when the Second Great Awakening occurred, the morphology of conversion had evolved to the point that extreme, emotional experiences were considered mandatory for full assurance of God’s grace. A pastor named Charles Finney codified the type and necessity of such experiences. Possibly the most influential churchman in the history of America, Finney popularized the traveling itinerant preaching of the so-called revivalists and was the most significant preacher in a long line of revivalist preachers including Dwight Moody, Billy Sunday, Billy Graham, and currently, Joel Osteen. Finney lectured extensively on the nature and importance of the conversion experience:
God has found it necessary to take advantage of the excitability there is in mankind, to produce powerful excitements among them, before he can lead them to obey. Men are so sluggish, there are so many things to lead their minds off from religion and to oppose the influence of the gospel, that it is necessary to raise an excitement among them, till the tide rises so high as to sweep away the opposing obstacles. They must be so excited that they will break over these counteracting influences, before they will obey God.14
The special working of the Spirit had to be felt in rather dramatic ways. Finney’s own conversion experience provided his assurance of salvation. In his Memoirs he shares it:
The Holy Spirit descended upon me in a manner that seemed to go through me, body and soul. I could feel the impression, like a wave of electricity, going through and through me. Indeed, it seemed like the very breath of God. I can recollect distinctly that it seemed to fan me like immense wings. . . . I wept aloud with joy and love; and I do not know but I should say, I literally bellowed out the unutterable gushings of my heart. These waves came over me, and over me, and over me, one after the other, until I recollect I cried out, “Lord, I cannot bear any more.”15
Touted as indispensable, Finney’s dramatic experience became the inalienable right of every Christian. Faith was defined as experience.

The experiential understanding of faith is propagated in America today by what has been called the Church Growth Movement, an amorphous movement within Evangelicalism that began and is centered in Pasadena, California, at Fuller Theological Seminary. One of that movement’s chief advocates and proponents is C. Peter Wagner, who served as dean of the Institute for Church Growth at Fuller Theological Seminary, where many leaders of Lutheran churches have studied. Wagner believes that the ideal sermon
is not intellectual, but emotional; it is not rational, but experiential; it is not exegetical, but allegorical; it is not doctrinal, but practical; it is not directed as much to the head as the heart, [the effect being] not that you learn more, but rather that you feel better.16
Notice that sermons are not ideal simply because they are gospel-centered, orthodox, doctrinally sound, or even coherent.


14.  Charles G. Finney, “What a Revival of Religion Is” (1864) in The American Evangelicals, ed. McLoughlin (New York: Harper and Row, 1968), 87.
15.  Charles G. Finney, Memoirs of Charles G. Finney (New York: Fleming H. Revell, 1903), 20.
16.  C. Peter Wagner, Look Out! The Pentecostals Are Coming (Carol Stream, IL: Creation House, 1973), 39–40.

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

If You Really Want Your Church to Grow…

Sometimes the obvious needs to be stated in order to get back on track.  Check out this blog entry from Dr. Jim West.